Yes, where they form part of the actual funding history.
Connect the source and path
Provide genuine records rather than assuming a transfer to a personal account resolves every preceding fact. Identify material gaps honestly.
Build a dated review file around sale agreements, tax and banking records, gift or loan instruments where relevant, transfer trail, subscription papers, and job evidence. Create a source-to-project ledger citing originals for the share sale, taxes, intervening accounts, any gift or loan, subscription, transfer, and capital deployment. Its practical purpose is to decide whether each step from lawful origin to qualifying capital can be supported without unexplained gaps, rather than to collect papers with no stated issue. Hypothetical example: a solar-glass entrepreneur sells shares, routes proceeds through a sibling’s account, then sends the investment from a different account. Reconcile the sale proceeds through the sibling’s account and onward transfer, explaining each account holder and retaining contemporary bank and tax support. Prove lawful origin first, trace every intermediary movement second, and finally tie the received funds to subscription and at-risk project deployment. A recurring problem is substituting a summary letter for contemporaneous records that show the actual sequence. EB-5 requires qualifying capital exposed to risk, the required employment creation under the applicable method, and later review of conditional residence. A petition approval does not itself grant residence or replace the later immigrant-visa or adjustment steps. Supplement the EB-5 trail whenever an account, transfer route, lender, donor, sale term, or project payment changes from the documented sequence.