Skip to content
APPLICATION ANSWERS · L-1A FIELD GUIDE

Drummondville: Can a manager retain some Canadian oversight?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

Describe the actual duties and locations for assessment; do not assume either a blanket prohibition or unrestricted permission.

Review the complete role

Identify how the U.S. managerial or executive position is supported and who performs ongoing operational work. The title alone does not establish the qualifying arrangement.

Build a dated review file around ownership records, the foreign employment timeline, reporting lines, delegation evidence, and the proposed U.S. role. Summarize the qualifying corporate relationship, foreign-year chronology, staffing layers, delegated operations, and proposed U.S. managerial or executive functions. Its practical purpose is to decide whether the person will principally manage or direct rather than personally deliver the ordinary operating work, rather than to collect papers with no stated issue. Hypothetical example: a manager at a compostable-packaging group will open a related U.S. unit but still personally handle its weekly production orders. Measure the weekly production work against the authority to direct staff or an essential function, using actual allocations rather than the manager title. Establish the related entities and qualifying employment year, then examine who performs routine operations and what decisions the transferee will control. A recurring problem is equating a senior title with managerial capacity without showing who performs the underlying work. The transfer normally calls for a full qualifying year with the related foreign organization during the three-year lookback. L-1A time has a seven-year aggregate ceiling; a new office also must later show that it can support the claimed managerial or executive role. Reassess L-1A classification if staffing, delegated duties, entity ownership, foreign operations, or the proposed U.S. role materially changes.